Process Review & Approval
Sort by:
Trending
Status:
Open for voting
Showing 45
5
VOTE
2
VOTE
1
VOTE
8
VOTE
7
VOTE
11
VOTE
When creating a process, have additional approvers as part of the approval workflow
When creating a new process, even if you have delegated an additional approver to be part of the workflow, they are not 'counted' or brought in until it has been published at least one. As they are noted as part of the workflow, they should review...
0
Open for voting
10
VOTE
Process reviews should not need to be republished
When processes are up for review they often don't need any changes. At present we are forced to make a minor change (ie. add a space somewhere) just to trigger the approval process to remove the process from the review cycle. This also updates the...
3
Open for voting
5
VOTE
Send approval request to additional approvers during first approval request.
The option to add additional approvers is only a change in the process currently. The process has to be approved by the current Owner/Expert and published, then if there is a change the process, it will also send a request to the additional approv...
0
Open for voting
11
VOTE
More detail in 'Process Approval Workflow Status'
The 'Process Approval Workflow Status' report currently provides a published/unpublished status for processes. It would be helpful if this report could include more detail of the exact stage of approval that the process is in, rather than 'unpubli...
3
Open for voting
6
VOTE
Remove declined processes from the publish list...
pushing forward with @AnthonyKumnick's request as it's been 3 years and whilst there was a response from Nintex that there was no intention of doing this, but to still put forward feedback, you can no longer vote on the issue but this is important...
0
Open for voting