Process Review & Approval
Sort by:
Trending
Status:
Open for voting
Showing 37
5
VOTE
Send approval request to additional approvers during first approval request.
The option to add additional approvers is only a change in the process currently. The process has to be approved by the current Owner/Expert and published, then if there is a change the process, it will also send a request to the additional approv...
0
Open for voting
11
VOTE
When creating a process, have additional approvers as part of the approval workflow
When creating a new process, even if you have delegated an additional approver to be part of the workflow, they are not 'counted' or brought in until it has been published at least one. As they are noted as part of the workflow, they should review...
0
Open for voting
6
VOTE
Remove declined processes from the publish list...
pushing forward with @AnthonyKumnick's request as it's been 3 years and whilst there was a response from Nintex that there was no intention of doing this, but to still put forward feedback, you can no longer vote on the issue but this is important...
0
Open for voting
10
VOTE
Process reviews should not need to be republished
When processes are up for review they often don't need any changes. At present we are forced to make a minor change (ie. add a space somewhere) just to trigger the approval process to remove the process from the review cycle. This also updates the...
3
Open for voting
11
VOTE
More detail in 'Process Approval Workflow Status'
The 'Process Approval Workflow Status' report currently provides a published/unpublished status for processes. It would be helpful if this report could include more detail of the exact stage of approval that the process is in, rather than 'unpubli...
3
Open for voting
6
VOTE
Add 'Process Writer' field so writers can receive notifications
Our business has process writers that write on behalf of SMEs and Owners. They do not receive notifications when there is feedback provided nor when processes are ready for review. If there was a Process Writer field they would be able to receive ...
2
Open for voting
9
VOTE
Allow bulk updating of review dates
We are wanting to update the explicit review date frequencies for our processes (500+) and there is no way to do this by bulk, meaning we are going to have go through one by one and make these changes which is absurd.
Ideally, we would have liked...
3
Open for voting
3
VOTE
Enable a "Reviewed it" button on the Proces itself instead of only via the "My reviews" page
When a Process Owner or Process Expert is reviewing a process, they have to toggle between two windows: One window to view the process - and make edits as possible The My Reviews Page - to click the "Reviewed It" button This makes it very cumberso...
0
Open for voting
8
VOTE
My Changes>Processes for Publishing: Processes getting double declined; rough Author experience.
We have configured that only our Promasters have a ability to Publish processes. We have a total of 4 Promasters monitoring and publishing or declining. We have had several processes where separate Promasters have declined the same process because...
1
Open for voting
7
VOTE
Process Acknowledgement - wording - "published" rather than "changed" when published by Promaster
As Promaster when publishing processes, process changes to acknowledge states "process has been changed by [promaster name]", it would be preferable to state "process has been published by [promaster name]", I find employees think I am changing th...
2
Open for voting