Process Review & Approval
Sort by:
Trending
Filter by:
Status
Showing 46 of 1068
1
VOTE
Ability to enable review on individual records vs. all processes or documents
There are often cases where not all documents that are added to the system need to be regularly reviewed. It would be great if there was an option to enable review on individual records (documents) instead of all or nothing.
0
Open for voting
1
VOTE
Required Comment When Changing Process Review Date
Promasters need to be able to control when an owner/expert overrides a default review date and why. Ideally this would be a setting where only BAs or Promasters are able to change from the default date, and if it is changed there a required change...
0
Open for voting
6
VOTE
Add 'Process Writer' field so writers can receive notifications
Our business has process writers that write on behalf of SMEs and Owners. They do not receive notifications when there is feedback provided nor when processes are ready for review. If there was a Process Writer field they would be able to receive ...
2
Open for voting
9
VOTE
Allow bulk updating of review dates
We are wanting to update the explicit review date frequencies for our processes (500+) and there is no way to do this by bulk, meaning we are going to have go through one by one and make these changes which is absurd.
Ideally, we would have liked...
3
Open for voting
8
VOTE
My Changes>Processes for Publishing: Processes getting double declined; rough Author experience.
We have configured that only our Promasters have a ability to Publish processes. We have a total of 4 Promasters monitoring and publishing or declining. We have had several processes where separate Promasters have declined the same process because...
1
Open for voting
7
VOTE
Process Acknowledgement - wording - "published" rather than "changed" when published by Promaster
As Promaster when publishing processes, process changes to acknowledge states "process has been changed by [promaster name]", it would be preferable to state "process has been published by [promaster name]", I find employees think I am changing th...
2
Open for voting
6
VOTE
Show approvers in ''Submit for Approval" dialogue
When sending a process for approval, the user can enter a short explanation of what has changed and why. Understanding your audience is key but there is nothing on this screen to show who the approvers are. To identify the approver the user has to...
1
Open for voting
3
VOTE
Enable a "Reviewed it" button on the Proces itself instead of only via the "My reviews" page
When a Process Owner or Process Expert is reviewing a process, they have to toggle between two windows: One window to view the process - and make edits as possible The My Reviews Page - to click the "Reviewed It" button This makes it very cumberso...
0
Open for voting
4
VOTE
Improve UX when submitting processes for approval
When submitting for approval you click the button in the top right, but at the next step - entering description - the bottom right button saves, but doesn't submit. That button is now on the left. Might smooth the UX if these were switched.
1
Open for voting
6
VOTE
Publication Declined should revert new process to Unpublished instead of In Progress
A new Process is in PAW (revision 0.xx) and Awaiting Publish. Once declined and back into editing state, it lists as In Progress. Instead, it needs to revert to Unpublished because the process has not been previously published. This inaccurate lab...
1
Open for voting