Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp)

We use the Improvement module to track workflow for incidents/events. It would be nice to see some form fields that are activated as a condition of response to a prior field. This would make the event submission experience cleaner for the user.

I often have the need to use the same activities across processes, I am aware of the export / import text from procedure option. Having a 'copy activity' option, that copies all the detail in an activity, in the cog wheel of each activity would sa...

Are there any plans to introduce QR codes for processes? We’ve got a request to set up a promapp process for charging an electric vehicle, and I’m thinking of best ways to set this up for users. Having a QR code on the dashboard that links to the...

Process Views by User Report. As this has the potential to be a large report if run over more than a day or so, it would be useful to be able to filter by user / users prior to exporting to excel.

I would like to be able to change Help> Contact Promaster to Contact (My company name) Promaster. Staff have said they thought that by clicking the Contact Promaster option it would send a message to Promapp / Nintex. They did not realise it wo...

Have the function where Promasters can leave 'internal' comments on Processes for other Promasters to view. This could be useful to track how processes are going and any discussions that have been had with the process owner/experts without leavi...

Overdue dashboard items for Promaster and Portfolio Managers show only overdue incidents and not overdue actions. If only 2/5 actions in an incident is overdue then the incident will not be reflected on the Promaster / Portfolio Managers Dashboard...

Currently when a weblink includes a system name it will tag that system to the process. In some cases that is not desired or accurate so we would like the ability to un-tag systems from weblinks manually. We are able to untag systems in the rest o...

An option (like a tick box) for the person submitting feedback to only make it visible to expert/owner (and promasters). This may encourage more honest feedback if they know it's not going to be seen by the rest of the Promapp community (in our ...

Currently to type it up and assign to someone else, it's a 3-step process. this frustrates our editors and owners/experts. Prefer it to be single step similar to how this is done within Google docs