When processes require approval the 'Subject Expert' should approve prior to the 'Owner' as best practice, however, Promapp does not allow that. With Promapp, the 'Owner' can approve prior to the SME and has no visibility as to whether the SME has previously approved. This causes issues with SME no longer having the Approval button on the process, plus often the SME may have changes that can't be made once the 'Owner' has already approved.
It would be more suitable for the SME to approve prior to the process notification for approval going to the 'Owner' for approval.
Make it optional for "succesive" approval workflow.
I can see appreciate the design of the delivered functionality - process should not have to wait, or be dependent on a given approver. In spite of this and after 5 months, some of my users would like to see the PAW as a successive experience: Subject Expert First, then Process Owner next.
We don't have a timeline for delivery yet, but keep an eye on our roadmap for updates.
For example our director may be a designated final approver so should only see the process in the queue once all the previous approvals have been performed.