Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Open for voting
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 19, 2019

RELATED IDEAS

Allow roles to be assigned to responsiblities

If I have a responsibility called Website Administrator who will be assigned to Manager of Media, Manager of Governance and Manager of IT then I would like to assign the roles to the responsibility rather than the names. Then who ever is assigned to those roles are automatically attached to the responsibility and I don't have to maintain multiple responsibilities when we have staff changes.
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    May 7, 2025

    We are currently adding our risks and controls and uplifting processes under Critical Owners for CPS230 implementation. There are discrepancies in the ability to add an owner of Processes, risks and controls between roles and individuals. Ideally, to support ongoing Operational resilience obligations, we need to assign at Role Level to allow for movements of staff and also to add alternate owners to accommodate for leave/ absence. Can you please advise if this can be considered for improvement.

    Reply
  • Guest
    Sep 7, 2022
    Great suggestion. We may look into implementing this as part of our Role/API improvements later next year. For now we'll monitor for other client interest. Thanks!
    Reply
  • Guest
    Sep 7, 2022
    I agreed but we stopped using responsibilities because they have no bearing in Promapp.
    Reply
  • Guest
    Sep 7, 2022
    I think this is a great idea. Responsibilities are required since activities can only have 6 roles / responsibilities assigned. They are a bit 'redundant' however if users are not assigned as no-one receives notifications and it's such a manual and time consuming process to ensure that any responsibilities with users assigned are maintained.
    Reply