Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp)

When you have responsibilities change across a large organisation, the grouping of a process may change. Sometimes a draft process may only be part way through completion. Currently we have to leave the process in the incorrect grouping until it i...

There is clear benefit in maintaining the current guidance of "1 role" per activity, so then we can clearly identify who is responsible for a step/activity. However; I think it would be good to be able to tag other roles within specific tasks e.g....

Please integrate the sub-process details in the printing (PDF) of a (main-) process. The result should be a single document for the process, its details plus the integrated sub-processes and their details.Thank you.

Once the process is reviewed by the Promaster prior Publishing (Awaiting Publishing queue) and Feedback is provided, the process should move out of the Awaiting Publishing queue and sent back for Approval.

Allow roles to contain other roles vs. just users.

Suggestion to capture and export user search data via Reports. This data would include: - What search terms are users inputting - What are the follow through rates i.e. What terms are users searching where they are getting no results or not follo...

Have an internal feedback option for collaboration and workflow that is not published/available to the rest of Promapp users. This could be used for work in progress processes and collaboration. A user could either leave comments/review notes for ...

Is there a report that shows which documents belong to which processes? The purpose of this would be to identify the improvement opportunity due to the number of documents belonging to multiple processes. Currently there is only a document list re...

The option to add additional approvers is only a change in the process currently. The process has to be approved by the current Owner/Expert and published, then if there is a change the process, it will also send a request to the additional approv...

pushing forward with @AnthonyKumnick's request as it's been 3 years and whilst there was a response from Nintex that there was no intention of doing this, but to still put forward feedback, you can no longer vote on the issue but this is important...